[Draw] Born This Way

Marisa

The Human Spellchecker ,
Old School
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
1,480
Points
0
tumblr_lk0nicqT7g1qe8brmo1_500.jpg


Photograph that I drew:
born_this_way_by_mspurplepiggy-d3ei65r.jpg


I didn't take the photograph, I only drew it. (Some of you already know that I tend to like to do that for some reason.)
 
I took a drawing class during my sophomore year of high school. Ever since then, sometimes I sketch stuff when I get bored.

Thanks. :)
 
I took a drawing class during my sophomore year of high school. Ever since then, sometimes I sketch stuff when I get bored.

Thanks. :)

That's awesome. I've never really been into that kind of stuff, But that's why I love Dodian cause It includes Literary Arts & Graphics. Something I enjoy looking at.

Sincerely,

Druggies
 
I really like this. Honestly, the only thing I can say is that her eye is a little too opened apposed to in the picture when it is sort of squinted.
 
I really like this. Honestly, the only thing I can say is that her eye is a little too opened apposed to in the picture when it is sort of squinted.

Yeah, I was having issues with proportion a bit. I tried to do it squinted the first time but her eye wasn't big enough. I need to work on eye shapes.
 
I see. I mean, You still hit some major details. I would have left out the eye glare and everything. If I attempted this, it would be some major poo poo. But, nonetheless, this was still a very great sketch/drawing.
 
You have some great talent there Marisa. Better than all of the people I know. If you haven't already, I would suggest coloring it in.
 
You have some great talent there Marisa. Better than all of the people I know. If you haven't already, I would suggest coloring it in.

It's done in graphite. Most of my sketches are done entirely in graphite to be honest. Sometimes I'll color in one thing, like eyes or a shirt or something. Not only that, I don't have coloring materials here.
 
I like the eye, but the rest seems way too un-detailed.
 
I like the eye, but the rest seems way too un-detailed.

I can see that. It was pretty much just a sketch 'cause I haven't done it for a while. I thought about adding the glares in the glasses frames but then I didn't.
 
um, honestly, it looks extremely amager. Not really any details, the drawing has the outline of the face, but besides the outline, you dont really capture any of the detail, like at all.
 
Make the glass frame more round, it's a bit too much edgy and square compared to the picture. Other than that, pretty cool.
 
um, honestly, it looks extremely amager. Not really any details, the drawing has the outline of the face, but besides the outline, you dont really capture any of the detail, like at all.

Amateur? I can tell you that this is better than that. That eye is proof of it. And who said it had to capture the details of the reference? A reference can only guide you so far. The rest is all you. You can change it however you want.

... Honestly, I'm not sure if I made any sense there. I can barely understand it. But then again, it's really late, so I might just be tired.

Anyways, back to the point: good job, Marisa. That eye is phenomenal. I can't really give much feedback right now (duhhhh). Here's something to consider, though: pay attention to the size of the glasses. I remember constantly messing up when it came to drawing them on faces when doing so still interested me. Your glasses are more square-box shaped, whereas the reference's are horizontal rectangle-egg shaped.

Oh, and I love how just the smallest change in the eyes can give a completely different emotion. :)

*Losm rambles on about more nonsense until he falls asleep midsen - snore*
 
Umm. Great job. I would say just to practic more. Draw it again. But Either Do it smaller or a large scale of it. I've taken a drawing class in highschool. I imporved so much just from drawing somthing a larger size the the picture/object. The less detail your sketch is the greater your depth your drawing could be come. Once you get the sketch down you could be good to go for detailed part.
 
Amateur? I can tell you that this is better than that. That eye is proof of it. And who said it had to capture the details of the reference? A reference can only guide you so far. The rest is all you. You can change it however you want.

... Honestly, I'm not sure if I made any sense there. I can barely understand it. But then again, it's really late, so I might just be tired.

Anyways, back to the point: good job, Marisa. That eye is phenomenal. I can't really give much feedback right now (duhhhh). Here's something to consider, though: pay attention to the size of the glasses. I remember constantly messing up when it came to drawing them on faces when doing so still interested me. Your glasses are more square-box shaped, whereas the reference's are horizontal rectangle-egg shaped.

Oh, and I love how just the smallest change in the eyes can give a completely different emotion. :)

*Losm rambles on about more nonsense until he falls asleep midsen - snore*

Losm, it was his opinion. Who cares, honestly.

Great sketch, the eye is the only thing that sticks out. Also, anyone who grades art or critique it is ****ing stupid. Expressing your opinion is perfectly fine such as saying what needs work and what looks great; but calling someone's work amateur, professional and so forth is just ridiculous.
 
Pretty nice.
I home boys brother can draw mary and al this shit behind her all bad ass.
Looks as if a master artist made it. He is only 19...
 
Back
Top