NFL Playoffs.

Saragoth said:
You all seem to be forgetting that the Eagles have...

1. Scored 28 points in 7 minutes in the 4th quarter. :)tehe
2. Have the #1 offense in the League
3. Beat the falcons by 10+ points in there encounter.
Click to expand...


1. That's one game
2. According to who? No statistics show that.
3. That's one game


The eagles won't go all the way, sorry.

Falcons/Patriots in the Superbowl

and I wouldn't care who won that game.
 
Packers and screw all you bandwagon fans. Packers are easily one of the most dynamic teams in the league and can win every game thrown at them. They did lose six games this year but their biggest loss by only by four points. They lost to Atlanta by 3 and beat the Eagles earlier this year and also just beat the Bears.

The Packers can definitely do this as a six seed, and if you doubt them you're a complete idiot.
 
Spot said:
Packers and screw all you bandwagon fans. Packers are easily one of the most dynamic teams in the league and can win every game thrown at them. They did lose six games this year but their biggest loss by only by four points. They lost to Atlanta by 3 and beat the Eagles earlier this year and also just beat the Bears.

The Packers can definitely do this as a six seed, and if you doubt them you're a complete idiot.
Click to expand...

I doubt them, but I definitely don't think I'm a complete idiot. Have you seen their amazing run game? The one where Rogers is the top rusher? No one wins the Superbowl without a run game. Did you see how they were when Rogers was out? That's the sign that they can't handle it, and if one piece falls off, the whole thing crumbles down. The Packers do have amazing receivers, and they have a lot of them, but it's not good enough without a run game. Their defense can also be shaky at times, and their run defense is horrendous. They can't handle Vick, Turner and Bush running at them. I bet even Seattle would get decent running yards against them if they ever met, and Seattle is ****. The Packers will most likely lose to the Eagles, but if they don't, they will definitely fall to the Falcons.
 
Their run defense is fairly solid and we have probably easily the best secondary in the league now. They were a monster yesterday and the defense completely shut down the hot Bears.

Also, when Rodgers was out for one game, Flynn played amazing for being a backup and we came within one play of being the Patriots, who are likely the best team in the NFL coming into the playoffs. We demolished the Giants who were praising for their great defense. We also did beat Vick earlier in the season granted it was a close contest.

I expect it to be close and either team can win, but the Eagles defense is MUCH worse than the Packers besides Asante Samuel. Vick's going to have to do A LOT with his feet to beat the Pack.

EDIT: Also, the Packers have the same YPC over the season as the Falcons. So much for the nonexistant running game? The Packers have a much, much better passing game, so they use it often.
 
YPC doesn't matter as much as the actual yards and touchdowns do. The Packers running game makes no impact on the game. What source are you using to say that your run defense is solid? No offense, but it's ****. Packers rank 18th in run defense, and have allowed 114.3 rushing yards per game. The Falcons haven't lost a single game this year when Turner crossed 100 yards. The secondary is good, but it's nothing that Pro Bowl Tight ends and Receivers can't beat. Also, as a note, the Bears were never hot. Once you get shut down 36-0 in the first half of a game, you cool down real fast. The Falcons also have a better turnover ratio.

Edit: You didn't really beat Vick, you beat the benched backup Kolb. It's a different thing to play 60 minutes against Vick then it is to play against Kolb.
 
This is like talking to a big ****hugger of the Falcons. The point is the Packers have lost all of their games by four points or less and can more or less win their next four games and the Super Bowl. Without a doubt.
 
Spot said:
This is like talking to a big ****hugger of the Falcons. The point is the Packers have lost all of their games by four points or less and can more or less win their next four games and the Super Bowl. Without a doubt.
Click to expand...


I too am a Falcons fan, but I do agree with you that the Packers have a good shot, they almost beat the best team in the NFL with a backup QB, and A Rog is just as good as Drew Brees, Eli Manning, etc. I dont think he's up there with Peyton and Tom yet but he's on his way.
 
He's had some of the best stats the past two years. He's accurate, he hardly throws interceptions (He's an Anti-Cutler). Please don't compare him to Eli Manning because that QB is not that great.
 
Born in Wisconsin always have been a fan of the packers and always will be go pack go. Screw all you bandwagon fans and "fair weather fans" like the vikes. When **** hits the fan we stick with our team not go cheer on the Twins.
 
Packers because I live in Green Bay! :D
 
Spot said:
This is like talking to a big ****hugger of the Falcons. The point is the Packers have lost all of their games by four points or less and can more or less win their next four games and the Super Bowl. Without a doubt.
Click to expand...

And if you say that anyone is completely dumb to doubt their Superbowl run is also ****ing biased. It is completely right to doubt them, because they can't finish out close games.
 
Ouch said:
And if you say that anyone is completely dumb to doubt their Superbowl run is also ****ing biased. It is completely right to doubt them, because they can't finish out close games.
Click to expand...

Saying that is completely irrelevant because of the small sample size the NFL has. If you were looking at a baseball schedule and had the same stats you could for certain say that a team can't close out games. Football is completely different and situational. There is no right to doubt them other than being a hater.

Also: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teameff

Efficiency of each team. THOSE are the stats that you can't **** with and really show how good a team has been.
 
Spot said:
Saying that is completely irrelevant because of the small sample size the NFL has. If you were looking at a baseball schedule and had the same stats you could for certain say that a team can't close out games. Football is completely different and situational. There is no right to doubt them other than being a hater.

Also: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teameff

Efficiency of each team. THOSE are the stats that you can't **** with and really show how good a team has been.
Click to expand...

That still doesn't make a justified argument as to why a random, non biased fan, would have no reason to doubt them. You have to realize that if they can't manage to close out even a couple of close games, then they can be deemed as chokers. In the NFL, you don't get many chances, and you don't have a huge sample size, so once you make a mistake, you have to correct it in the future games and not repeat it. You can't afford to make the same error 6 times in one season and expect to be walk in favorites who are undoubted by anyone to make it to the Superbowl. Btw, the link you provided is unreadable, and it won't open on my computer for some reason. I'd appreciate it if you could copy-paste it and post it here.
 
I'm not a big fan of football, but from the highlights I've seen from this season and some games, I think the New-England Patriots are going to win the Super Bowl.
 
Spot said:
He's had some of the best stats the past two years. He's accurate, he hardly throws interceptions (He's an Anti-Cutler). Please don't compare him to Eli Manning because that QB is not that great.
Click to expand...


Whatever you jew, I'm just saying he's not quite up there with Tom Brady and Peyton Manning, but he's good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top